Are Australians prudish breastfeeding?

Forced adoption in Australia: babies taken from their mothers while still in the delivery room

Today it is unthinkable that the state could force young, single mothers to put their babies up for adoption. This is what happened in prudish Australia from the 50s to the 70s. With the moralists in society, Australia's state took action against young mothers. Minors and pregnant, that was a shame in prudish Australia from the 50s to 70s.

Forced adoption against protests of the mothers

150,000 children came to families that the state found worthy. At that time, babies were taken away from young mothers in the delivery room, often against the protests of the mothers. The young women were forced to sign the adoption papers. The government is now ashamed of this coercive policy. Prime Minister Julia Gillard will apologize to parliament on Thursday (March 21).

"The horror of our history" - that is what a parliamentary committee called the practice last year. "No question about it, mothers, fathers, adopted children and all their loved ones were seriously harmed," said Greens Committee Chair Rachel Siewert. Parliament recommended the formal apology.

"Moral conceit and arrogance"

Not everyone thinks that's right. "We judge the past by today's standards, with moral conceit and arrogance," wrote columnist Miranda Divine. "In many cases, mothers put their children up for adoption out of love."

At that time, many underage mothers were deported to institutions for fallen girls. "One mother said to me, I had three options. Put the baby up for adoption, marry a man who wasn't interested, or jump off a bridge," says Anne, a spokeswoman for Adoption Jigsaw, who is around Cares for victims of forced adoptions. She doesn't want to give her last name.

Mother never saw her son

"I was told: Shut up and see that you finish here," reports a woman who was 15-year-old pregnant in 1966 in a survey by the Institute for Family Studies. She never saw her son. When she protested, another child was held to her chest. "That's why I was never able to bring myself to breastfeed my three children later," she says. Another woman, who became pregnant very young, later married the father of the child who was taken away from her. "We didn't have any more children for nine years because we were so sad that the first one was stolen from us," she said in the survey.

Many mothers then realized that adoption was best for their child, says Terri Kelleher, spokeswoman for the Christian Family Association (AFA). "I would like to hear a thank you from the Prime Minister to these mothers and adoptive parents, who in most cases have given the children a happy and stable home."

One woman wrote to the Daily Telegraph: "I had a child in 1964 and, like many unmarried women, decided to put the baby up for adoption. Now the government wants to apologize for my decision. But I think I did the right thing. "

Angela Barra describes herself as a "survivor" of a forced adoption. She found her biological parents only after years of searching. "Anyone who gets to know me sees a happy face and an amiable appearance. But if you take a closer look, you see my fear of contact and anxiety, my physical and emotional scars," she wrote about her life. She welcomes the apology. "Above all, I'm waiting for you to announce concrete steps to ensure that something like this never happens again - otherwise the whole apology would be pointless."