Can the US be viewed as an oligarchy?

Interest Groups in the USA: Political Influence Between Pluralism and Lobbyism

Handbook of Politics USA pp 1-16 | Cite as

  • Martin Thunert
Living reference work entry
First Online:

Summary

The American interest group landscape is characterized by its enormous diversity. The article takes a theory-led empirical look at the landscape of organized interest representation and think tanks in the USA. In a first step, the American interest group landscape - with special consideration of the trade unions - and the advocacy scene are roughly outlined and typologized. Then it is about their role in the political system of the USA as well as lobbying as a primary influence strategy as well as attempts to regulate lobbying legally. In a third step, the manifestations of the American interest group landscape are explained using different theoretical approaches, before a fourth and final section deals with the influence of interest groups on the political decision-making process.

keywords

Interest groups Trade unions Think tanks Lobbying Super-PACs Advocacy Regulation Collective action
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

literature

  1. AssociationExecs.com. 2014. National Trade and Professional Associations Directory 2014. Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic interests. The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 2001. Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics 63: 1191-1213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry M. Jeffrey, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The process of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics - BLS. 2014. News release. Union Members 2013. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf. Accessed on December 15, 2014.
  7. Boehmke, Frederick J. 2002. The effect of direct democracy on the size and diversity of state interest group populations. Journal of Politics 64 (3): 827-844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chari, Raj, John Hogan, and Gary Murphy. 2010. Regulating lobbying: a global comparison. Manchester: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Continetti, Matthew. 2006. The K street gang. The rise and fall of the republican machine. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  10. Dolny M. 2013. FAIR study: Think tank spectrum 2012. July 1, 2013, http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/fair%E2%80%88study-think-tank-spectrum-2012. Accessed on December 15, 2014.
  11. Eastman, Hope. 1997. Lobbying: a constitutionally protected right. Washington, DC: AEI.Google Scholar
  12. Gale Directory Library. 2014. Encyclopedia of Associations, http://find.galegroup.com/gdl/help/GDLeDirEAHelp.html. Accessed on December 15, 2014.
  13. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564-581. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Go to. 2013. Think tank index report. University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia. gotothinktank.com/dev1/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/GoToReport2013.pdf. Accessed on December 15, 2014.
  15. Graziano, Luigi. 2001. Lobbying, pluralism and democracy. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Greven T. 2006. Is it just a break or a departure? The split in the US unions. The Case for Philosophy and Social Sciences 264, Special Issue Outlook on America, Vol. 48 (1): 85-94. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2010. Winner-takes-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer - And turned its back on the middle class. New York: Schuster & Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Hays, R. Allen. 2001. Who speaks for the poor? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Imig, Douglas R. 1996. Poverty and power. The political representation of poor Americans. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser, Robert G. 2010. So damn much money. The triumph of lobbying and corrosion of American government. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Krick, Eva. 2014. The stricter, the better? Regulation of lobbying in the USA and the EU. In Interest groups and parliaments, Eds. Thomas von Winter and Julia von Blumenthal, 235-274. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leech, Beth L., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 1998. Lobbying friends and foes in Washington. In Interest group politics. 5th ed. Eds. Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, 217-233. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
  24. Lobbyists.Info. 2014. Washington Representatives Directory. Fall edition 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Delete P. 2008. Associations, unions and the system of industrial relations. Country report USA, Ed. P. Lösche, 5th ed., 274-314. Bonn Bpb Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Maskell J. 2014. Post-employment, Revolving Door, Laws for Federal Personnel, Congressional Research Service. 7.1. 2014. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42728.pdf. Accessed on December 15, 2014.
  27. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rich, Andrew. 2004. Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13 (1): 1-32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schattschneider, E.E. 1961. Semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  31. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady. 2012. The unheavenly chorus. Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, Mark A. 2000. American business and political power: Public opinion, elections and democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, Mark A. 2010. The mobilization and influence of business interests. In The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups, Ed. Andrew McFarland, 451-467. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thunert, Martin. 2003. Is that the way wise like it? Lobbying in the USA. In The silent power. Lobbyism in Germany, Eds. Thomas Leif and Rudolf Speht, 320–334. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Truman, David B. 1951. The governmental process. Political interests and public opinion. New York: Button, Google Scholar
  36. Trumbull, Gunnar. 2012. Strength in numbers: The political power of weak interests. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heidelberg Center for American StudiesUniversity HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany